The current state of global economics is shaped by influential macro systems such as Governments, Finance (as represented by the IMF and the World Bank), Business (as represented by the WEF), and the Military Complex. Together, these agencies bear the responsibility of determining the well-being of nations and the planet. However, the inherently divisive and competitive nature of our global governance structure poses a significant challenge to addressing pressing global challenges, leading to persisting inequities.
Consider the disparities in global economics outlined in reports such as the “World Bank Report on Global Economics/Poverty, Year in Review: 2018.” While there has been significant progress in reducing extreme poverty globally, millions still live in dire conditions, with Sub-Saharan Africa bearing the brunt of poverty. Moreover, forced displacement, climate change, air pollution, waste management, sanitation, nutrition, education, gender equality, debt dynamics, urbanization, financial inclusion, and other issues continue to plague societies worldwide.
Nations that contribute the most in terms of resources often find themselves amongst the poorest in the world, highlighting fundamental questions about the fairness and equity of our economic systems. Furthermore, countries with the lowest contributions to emissions suffer the most from climate change, emphasizing the urgent need for systemic reform.
Institutions like the IMF and WEF wield significant influence over global economic policies. However, their impact has coincided with widening inequality, environmental degradation, and social unrest. This dissonance between their professed objectives and the prevailing global socio-economic reality demands a reevaluation of their impact on the greater good.
The introduction of terms like “Coopetition” as a response to the climate crisis underscores the desperation to preserve an economic model that has contributed to our current predicament. Previous attempts at international cooperation have yielded limited results, as the underlying competitive paradigm remains unchanged.
Our global social conditions establish that the status quo perpetuated by institutions like the IMF and WEF is inadequate to address the pressing issues of our time. The reluctance to embrace fundamental change stems from the fact that the very beneficiaries of this system are tasked with its reform. This inherent conflict of interest underscores the urgency of systemic transformation.
To forge a path towards a more inclusive, sustainable, and equitable future, we must challenge the prevailing economic orthodoxy. The IMF and WEF, as stalwarts of the current system, must be open to introspection and reform. It is time to move beyond rhetoric and translate ideals into tangible actions that prioritize the well-being of people and the planet.
Jeffrey Sachs’ call to expand the G20 to the G21 by inviting the chairperson of the African Union is a step in the right direction towards global inclusion in decision-making. Giving representation to 1.4 billion people from Africa at the table for finance is essential for creating a more equitable and just economic order.
In embracing a new paradigm, we embark on a collective journey towards a global economic model that truly serves the greater good—a model that transcends the limitations of competition and embraces cooperation for the betterment of humanity and the preservation of our precious environment.
Economic Transformation is a reality that cannot be avoided in our pursuit of Sustainability. The case for economic reform is well and clearly established.
Our current socioeconomic model is the root cause of our sustainability challenges, and an immediate and meaningful response to those threats is required.
We have the intellectual and technological capability to create a sustainable global economic model and implement a feasible transformation plan. We must Act Now!
Tony Redman